REGENERATION AND
CONVERSION
CHAPTER XXXII from
ABSTRACT OF THEOLOGY
J.P. Boyce
At the outset of a
discussion of these two subjects we are met by the question, whether they are
not one and the same thing. They are unquestionably so intimately associated
that it is difficult to separate them and point out the distinctions between
them. The Scriptures connect the two under the one idea of the new birth, and
teach that not only is regeneration an absolute essential in each conversion,
but that in every intelligent responsible soul conversion invariably
accompanies regeneration. It is not strange, therefore, that they are often
confounded. Yet, after all, the Scriptures also teach that regeneration is the
work of God, changing the heart of man by his sovereign will, while conversion
is the act of man turning towards God with the new inclination thus given to
his heart.
I. It is best first to
collect together the various terms and expressions in which this whole matter
is taught.
1. Forms of the verb gennao,
which means "to beget."
John
2. Compound forms of gennao.
1 Pet. 1:23. "Having
been begotten again, not of corruptible seed, but of incorruptible, through the
word of God, which liveth and abideth."
Titus 3:5. "He saved
us through the washing of regeneration and renewing of the Holy Ghost."
3. The word apekuesen
is used in James
4. Ktisis and ktizo,
which mean creation and create, are found in 2 Cor. 5:17; Gal. 6:15; Eph.
5. Sunezoopoiesen,
he quickened together with (Christ). Eph. 2:5; Col. 2:13.
In addition to the above
uses of single words are the following passages which speak of the word of God
as an effective instrument, but not as a creative power. These, however, do not
connect this instrument with either regeneration or conversion necessarily; but
speaks of it (a) as a means of partaking of the divine nature, 2 Pet. 1:4; (b)
as a means of purifying, John 15:3; (c) as a means of Christian defense, Eph.
6:17; and (d) as an instrument of powerful conviction and destruction of the
wicked, Heb. 4:12.
II. From the Scriptural
teaching we see that the whole work of Regeneration and Conversion is included
under the one term regeneration.
It is true that but few of
the passages refer to anything save the work of God; yet these few sufficiently
teach the use of the word in regeneration to lead us not to reject, as a part
of it, that result of God's act which, in connection with the word, leads to
the full union of its subject with Christ through repentance and faith.
The passages in connection
with Paul as God's instrument, 1 Cor. 4:15, and Philemon 10, would not be
conclusive, but they are made so by others.
However much James 1:18
suggests a different aspect of the work, namely, the bringing forth that which
has been begotten, still it so nearly connects that idea with the begetting as
to create doubt if the whole work may not be virtually involved.
But 1 Pet. 1:23, by the use
of the compound of gennao, shows that all the work of the Spirit,
including both the new heart and the leading of it to conscious faith, is
properly to be spoken of by the same term as a mere change of heart.
The whole work is thus
spoken of, however, because God is operative from the beginning to the end, but
this does not prove that he does not operate differently in one part from what
he does in the other.
III. The
Scripture teaching is that God operates immediately upon the heart to produce
the required change, by which it is fitted to receive the truth, and mediately
through the word in its reception of that truth.
1. He operates immediately
upon the heart to prepare the way for the truth. This is evident
(1.) From the description
given of man's spiritual condition.
(a) As spiritually dead.
Eph. 2:1.
(b) As blind. Eph. 4:18.
(c) As slaves to sin. John
(d) As needing deliverance
from the powers of darkness. Col. 1:13.
(e) As incapable of knowing
or discerning the things of the Spirit. 1 Cor. 2:14; Eph. 4:18.
(f) As incapable of
changing himself. Jer. 13:23.
(g) As defiled in
conscience. Tit. 1:15.
These passages show man in
a condition from which he must be rescued even to understand and appreciate the
truth of God.
(2.) The Scripture
attributes the birth to the will of God exclusively, thus showing that in some
aspect it is not to be regarded as due to the reception of the truth. John
1:13.
[For sections (3), (4), (5)
and (6), see Hodge's Outlines, p. 451.]
(3.) The influence of the
Spirit is distinguished from that of the word. John 6:45, 64, 65; 1 Cor.
2:12-15; 1 Thess. 1:5, 6.
(4.) A divine influence is
declared to be necessary for the reception of the truth. Ps. 119:18; Acts
16:14; Eph. 1:17-20.
(5.) Such an internal
operation on the heart is attributed to God. Matt. 11:25; Luke 10:21; Phil.
2:13; 2 Thess. 1:11; Heb. 13:21.
(6.) The nature of this
influence is evidently different from that effected by
the truth. Eph. 1:19; 3:7; 2 Tim. 2:25.
(7.) This influence is
spoken of as a preparation of the heart for the truth; which, therefore, must
be distinct from the truth or its reception. Luke 8:8, 15; Acts 16:14.
This preparation of the
heart comes from God. 1 Chron. 29:18, 19; Ps. 119:18; Prov.
16:1; Acts
2. The Spirit acts
mediately through the word.
(1.) He inspired that word
and sends it forth for the accomplishment of the ends designed. John 14:16; 2
Tim. 3:16.
(2.) He aids the ministry
and others in making it known. 1 Cor. 4:7; 2 Thess. 3:1.
To the extent that these
are his agents he uses the word.
(3.) The instrument thus
used is in itself effective as truth. Heb. 4:12. Therefore, Christians are
commanded in their spiritual warfare to take the word of God as the sword of
the Spirit. Eph. 6:17. It is, however, made especially so to the heart prepared
for it by his illuminating influences, which reveal its beauties and its
suitableness, and by the aid of the memory which recalls, and the conscience
which applies, and the affections which lay hold upon it. 2 Tim. 3:15, 16, 17.
(4.) Christians are,
therefore, said to be "brought forth, (James
(5.) Since this use of the
Scriptures is due to their own fitness to present motives to action, the Spirit
of God is not limited to this word alone but uses such other truth, and such
events of life as may be effective towards the contemplated end. Thus any
events in God's providence, as afflictions, or dangers, or personal sins, or the
conversion of others, or aught else that may lead to seeking God, are used as a
means of awakening, or of giving deeper conviction, or of enforcing the
Scripture truths which lead to conversion.
(6.) This is especially
true of the ordinances of Baptism and the Lord's Supper duly set forth before
mankind. So far as these ordinances are fitted to convey truth, or to impress
duty, they are instrumental in regeneration.
(7.) But neither of them
regenerates or confers regeneration.
(a) This is not done by the
Lord's Supper. It has been argued from John 6:51-58, where Christ promises
eternal life to those who shall eat his flesh and drink his blood, and denies
it to all who shall not. The language used refers to spiritual participation in
his salvation. It is similar to the promise to the woman at Sychar that
"Whosoever drinketh of the water that I shall give him shall never thirst;
but the water that I shall give him shall become in him a well of water
springing up into everlasting life." John 4:14. It is argued that Christ
must have meant partaking of his real body, because he did not correct the Jews
who, because they so understood him, rejected him. But, John 8:51-53, he did
not correct a similar mistake which led to a similar result when he said in verse
51, "If a man keep my word he shall never see
death."
(b) Even more distinctly is
this true of Baptism. Spiritual effects are spoken of in connection with this
ordinance. Thus we have "the washing of regeneration and renewing of the
Holy Ghost." Titus 3:5. We have Paul exhorted by Ananias, Acts 22:16,
"arise and be baptized and wash away thy sins," and the language of
Christ, John 3:5, "Except a man be born of water and the Spirit, he cannot
enter into the
(1.) That ordinances can
only be signs of grace and cannot confer it.
(2.) They may convey truth
symbolically, and only such truth is fitted to affect the mind. But nothing
symbolized by these two can confer regeneration upon those receiving them.
(3.) They are appointed to
be used only by those who have been regenerated. Baptism is an act of
obedience, symbolizing the death of believers to sin, and resurrection to new
life, and setting forth their union with Christ in his death and burial. The
Lord's Supper is to be partaken of by those already, as Christian believers,
united together in church fellowship.
(4.) That this was the use
of Baptism is evident from the practice of the Apostolic Christians. Acts
(5.) That this was also
true of the Lord's Supper is shown by the fact that it was partaken of only by
churches, and the members of churches are everywhere spoken of and treated as
converted persons; also by the further fact that it was a memorial service
("in remembrance of me") and a memorial implies previous knowledge of
the persons and facts remembered. But only such a knowledge and remembrance
could be blessed, as involved faith in Jesus. 1 Cor. 11:28, 29.
(6.) The Spirit does not
make truth effective by giving it additional force to that which it has
naturally, but by so affecting the mind that the man is prepared to receive it
with its own due force. Thus he changes the mind, illuminates the mind, helps
it appreciate and lay hold of truth. Only thus does he make truth effectual.
Therefore, the outward washing or partaking can have no effect to renew, or
regenerate the heart, which must itself have been prepared, before it can even
appropriate the truths conveyed by these ordinances.
The above statements are
only intended to meet the views of Romanists and such others as claim
regenerating influence of sacraments, and not those of
such as make Baptism only a condition of pardon. The latter claim that regeneration
is through the word only and are met by the proofs
that the Spirit acts independently of the word.
Conversion
I. This is the result of
regeneration. The new heart is prepared to turn to God and does actually so
turn. Without regeneration, the sinfulness of man keeps him away from God,
causes him to set his affections upon self and his own pleasure, and to find
gratification in things which are opposed to God and holiness. The regenerated
heart has new affections and desires and is, therefore, fitted to seek after
God and holiness.
II. It is both the act of
God and of man co-operating with him.
1. It is the act of God. It
is thus described in the Scriptures.
1 Kings
Ps. 80:3. "Turn us
again, O God; and cause thy face to shine, and we shall be saved."
Ps. 85:4. "Turn us, O
God of our salvation."
Song of Sol. 1:4.
"Draw me; we will run after thee."
Jer. 30:21. "I will
cause him to draw near, and he shall approach unto me."
Jer. 31:18. "Turn thou
me, and I shall be turned."
Ezek. 36:27. "And I
will put my Spirit within you, and cause you to walk in my statutes, and ye
shall keep my judgments, and do them."
John 6:44. "No man can
come to me, except the Father which sent me draw him."
2. It is the act of the
regenerated heart actively co-operating in thus turning.
Deut. 4:30. "Thou
shalt return to the Lord thy God."
Prov. 1:23. "Turn you
at my reproof."
Hosea 12:6. "Therefore
turn thou to thy God."
Isaiah 55:7. "Let him
return unto the Lord."
Joel 2:13. "Rend your
heart, and not your garments, and turn unto the Lord your God."
Acts
III. The question naturally
arises what is the nature of conversion. In reply it may be said that it
consists:
1. Not in mere outward
reformation.
2. Not in return from
backsliding.
3. But in the turning of
the heart to God and holiness. It is a turning of the thoughts, desires and
affections of the heart from sinful and carnal lusts and pleasures toward holy
things, and God, and Christ, and salvation. It is a turning from darkness to
light, from the power of Satan to God. [See Gill's Divinity 2:132-4.] It
consists "in a man's turning actively to God under the influence of divine
grace." [Gill 2:135]
IV. This conversion
comprises:
2. Knowledge of personal
sin, guilt and condemnation.
3. Sorrow for sin and
desire to escape condemnation.
4. Determination to turn
away from sin and seek God.
5. Conviction of personal
need of help in so doing.
6. Knowledge of Christ as a
Saviour from sin.
7. Personal trust in Christ
and his salvation.
NOTE. A man in one sense
maybe called converted as soon as he has truly turned to God and is also
seeking to know and do his will. This is that amount of conversion which is so nearly contemporaneous with regeneration as to be liable
to be supposed to exist at the same moment with it, and which indeed in a being
capable of thought on such subjects must be its immediate effect.
But what the Scriptures and
common language comprise in this word is repentance and trust in God's saving
power, and, in connection with Christian knowledge, trust in Jesus Christ as a
Saviour. The attainment of the fullness of such conversion is by the gradual
appreciation of truth, resulting not only from regeneration, and knowledge, but
from spiritual illumination of the mind.
V. The relation of
regeneration to conversion will, therefore, appear to be one of invariable
antecedence.
Wherever the appropriate
truth is at the time present its relation is almost that of producing cause,
for the prepared heart at once receives the truth. Hence, as this is so
generally the case, they have been usually regarded as contemporaneous and by
some even as identical. But that regeneration is the invariable antecedent is
seen,
1. From the fact that the
heart is the soil in which the seed, the word of God, is sown, and that seed
only brings forth fruit in the good soil. The heart is made good soil by
regeneration.
2. Regeneration (as in
infants) may exist without faith and repentance, but the latter cannot exist
without the former. Therefore, regeneration precedes.
3. Logically the enabling
act of God must, in a creature, precede the act of the creature thus enabled.
But this logical antecedence involves actual antecedence, or the best
conceptions of our mind deceive us and are not reliable. For this logical
antecedence exists only because the mind observes plainly a perceived
dependence of the existence of the one on the other. But such dependence
demands, if not causal, at least antecedent existence. Here it is only
antecedent.
VI. There is not only
antecedence, but in some cases an appreciable interval.
1. This is true even of
conversion regarded as a mere turning to God. Between it and regeneration must
intervene in some cases some period of time until the knowledge of God's
existence and nature is given, before the heart turns, or even is turned
towards that God.
(1.) This must be true of
all infants and of all persons otherwise incapable of responsibility, as for
example idiots.
(2.) There is no reason why
it should not be true of some heathen. The missionaries of the cross have been
sought by men, who knew nothing of Christianity, but whose hearts, unsatisfied
with the religion of their fathers, were restlessly seeking for what their soul
was crying out.
2. It is still more
manifestly true of full Christian conversion.
(1.) The Scriptures teach
this in many examples of persons pious, holy, and fearing God, yet unacquainted
with the full truth which secures union with Christ.
Ethiopian Eunuch: Acts
Paul: Acts, chapter 9, 22
and 26. Galatians, chapters 1st and 2d.
Cornelius the Centurion:
Acts 10:2.
(2.) The experience of
ministers in all ages with persons seeking and attaining salvation confirms
this idea. The attainment of conversion may be marked by stages. The sinner is
at first totally indifferent. The word produces on him no effect. Then (1.) There is an evident willingness to give serious
attention to the truth of God. God has opened the heart as he did that of
VII. The term conversion is
not technically applied to any change, except that which follows upon
regeneration, and consists in the Godward turning of one heretofore turned
entirely away from God. The return of men who have
backslidden, or fallen into grievous sin, is also called "a return to
God," and such a return is possibly what is called "conversion"
in Peter's case. Luke 22:32. But conversion is theologically used exclusively
of the first act.